Call Us Now

Blog

Partial Summary Judgment Remains a Rare Option For Keeping Costs Low In Civil Matters

Posted On: December, 20 2018

Trial courts continue to iron out the practicalities of the “culture shift” called for by the Supreme Court of Canada in Hryniak v Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7 to move away from full trial processes to shorter, less expensive options when doing so is fair and just.

One of those options is to proceed by way of partial summary judgment, where the court identifies a discrete legal and factual issue and renders a decision on this issue separate from litigation as a whole.

Partial summary judgment can mean that one party is judged apart from the larger litigation while the case continues against the rest of the parties, or it can mean that some of the issues between the parties are resolved while the other issues proceed to trial. For recent examples of the latter, see Service Mold + Aerospace Inc. v. Khalaf, 2018 ONSC 5345 and The Bank of Nova Scotia v. 1736223 Ontario Limited, 2018 ONSC 4449.

Earlier this year, Justice Myers of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Toronto offered a comprehensive review of the issue in Mason v. Perras Mongenais, 2018 ONSC 1477, which in turn referred to the leading decisions from the Ontario Court of Appeal in Baywood Homes Partnership v. Haditaghi, 2014 ONCA 450 and Butera v. Chown, Cairns LLP, 2017 ONCA 78.

In Butera, Pepall J.A., writing for the court, observed that partial summary judgment should be considered a rare procedure. Indeed, decisions released at the Superior Court of Ontario this year confirm that it is more likely than not that a motion for partial summary judgment will be dismissed.

The most common reason is that doing so risks duplicating proceedings or producing inconsistent findings, which undermines the expediency offered by motions for summary judgment.

Discrete issues are best suited for partial summary judgment motions because they do not overlap with the issues to be heard at trial. Where there is overlap, the judge hearing a motion for partial summary judgment will ask “whether the risks of duplication and inconsistent findings outweigh the benefits of summary resolution and preclude summary resolution from being proportionate where the case is brought to an end against some but not all of the parties.” For a fulsome discussion relating to partial summary judgment motions, we refer you to the Mason decision.

 

No feedback yet

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.
BadExcellent
(For my next comment on this site)
(Allow users to contact me through a message form -- Your email will not be revealed!)

Contact Us

RECENT NEWS & EVENTS

5 STAR REVIEWS

  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto James Reviewed by SB

    "I just wanted to let you know how happy I am with the outcome and how very grateful I am for the guidance and support that you and your team provided.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto James Reviewed by Google user

    "Patrick James is really a great lawyer who is smart and great to deal with. He's been our litigation counsel for over 5 years on several different matters. Patrick recently gave our company great strategic advice that resulted in a big commercial litigation win for our company. He's fierce, tenacious, and really cares about getting the best outcome for his clients."
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto James Reviewed by Google user

    "Patrick is a very good lawyer. He recently successfully defended a lawsuit against my company and has pursued several litigation claims for us in the past. All claims settled input favour. Mr. James is smart and quickly gives you great strategic advice. Patrick has been a real asset to our business."
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto James Reviewed by Sandra L.

    "Andrew Wray and Patrick James recently helped settle a difficult situation for me and my family. The results were exactly what we were hoping for. They are honest, strategic and will provide you with the best advice for you and your financial situation. I highly recommend them to everyone I know."
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto James Reviewed by Mark C.

    "Their team is highly focused and incredibly professional - from our experience it would be difficult not to believe that Pinto Wray James are one of Ontario's leading Firms in Labor and Employment law. The mindful client care and complete understanding of the case eased fears and the stress that comes with any legal dispute. Expect to find high level smartly crafted legal solutions at Pinto Wray James LLP - couldn't recommend more."
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto James Reviewed by Sherry C.

    "Patrick is knowledgeable, strategic, supportive, and patient. His guidance and advice helped me to maintain focus and to keep things in perspective. His experience and keen perception provides him with an edge that allows him to assess the situation, the people involved, and to offer a strategic resolution that works best for all involved. If you ever require legal advice and assistance, I highly recommend him and his team. They will be there 100% for you."
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto James Reviewed by Christian V.

    "Patrick is a fearless advocate for diverse clients. His strategic approach, and his empathy, are what set him apart as a litigator, and champion of the underdog."
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto James Reviewed by A Google User

    "I have no hesitation recommending Andrew Wray of Pinto Wray James LLP. He provided me with legal advice regarding an employment law issue and his council was practical and honest. Andrew's approach is very much one of blending legal excellence with good common sense. An excellent lawyer!"
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto James Reviewed by Larry S.

    "Patrick listens to his clients and shows compassion, empathy and professionalism. He cares deeply that the individual that has been wrongfully terminated gets the best judgment available to him. I would not hesitate in recommending him to friends or family."
Submit